{"id":6579,"date":"2025-12-31T20:19:22","date_gmt":"2025-12-31T19:19:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/?p=6579"},"modified":"2026-02-16T09:24:19","modified_gmt":"2026-02-16T08:24:19","slug":"are-we-good-or-do-we-need-to-keep-going-unraveling-auditors-comfort-with-evidence-sufficiency-determinations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/blog\/2025\/12\/31\/are-we-good-or-do-we-need-to-keep-going-unraveling-auditors-comfort-with-evidence-sufficiency-determinations\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Are we good? or do we need to keep going?\u2019: unraveling auditors\u2019 comfort with evidence sufficiency determinations"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Suppose you think of auditors\u2019 work as completing a puzzle. Auditors can\u2019t form a complete picture to conclu<span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span> that the financial statements are \u201cfree from material misstatement\u201d when evi<span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>nce is missing or incorrect.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Audit evi<span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>nce, then, is the information the auditors rely on to form a sound judgment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">But not all evi<span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>nce is created equal. The standards emphasize two key qualities. First, the evi<span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>nce must be appropriate, meaning it must be both relevant and reliable. Evi<span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>nce must also be sufficient, referring to the quantity of evi<span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>nce consi<span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>red enough to convincingly support the auditor\u2019s opinion.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">While audit standards state that evi<span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>nce must be \u201csufficient and appropriate,\u201d in practice, those standards rarely specify precisely how much evi<span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>nce is enough.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Drawing on interviews with 45 auditors from firms of varying sizes, we <span data-markjs=\"true\">ana<\/span>lyzed how professionals <span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>termine that they have collected sufficient appropriate evi<span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>nce to conclu<span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">We found that auditors typically begin with established guidance: pre<span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>fined document lists, criteria, and clear sampling and testing thresholds. These structured tools offer initial certainty, but they often fall short in complex or ambiguous situations, where risk, estimation, or unusual transactions challenge expectations. In such cases, auditors <span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>scribed a shift from checklist-based reasoning to a more adaptive, fluid process of interpreting and contextualizing evi<span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>nce.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">A central finding is that comfort drives many sufficiency <span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>cisions. Comfort reflects a provisional state that emerges through iterative judgment. When discomfort arises, auditors adjust expectations by revising thresholds, gathering incremental evi<span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>nce, or forming new mental mo<span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>ls. They also draw on prior experience, client history, and peer consultation to recalibrate what counts as enough evi<span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>nce.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">This suggests that evi<span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>nce sufficiency is not a one-time <span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>termination, but a recursive feedback loop between structured procedures, interpersonal interactions, and auditors\u2019 affective sense of when evi<span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>nce sufficiency has been achieved. In practice, the process is shaped by interpersonal interactions as much as technical standards: discussions with clients, specialists, and reviewers often tip the balance toward either \u201cwe\u2019re good\u201d or \u201cwe need to keep going.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Overall, the study contributes to a more realistic un<span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>rstanding of how sufficiency judgments are ma<span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>. By uncovering how auditors blend procedural rules with evolving discomfort\/comfort cues, our findings offer insights for standard setters, regulators, and practitioners seeking clearer guidance on evi<span data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>nce expectations, especially in complex areas involving estimates and uncertainty.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The reference for this article can be found below:<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN-CA\">Altiero, E. C., Baudot, L., &amp; Hazgui, M. (2025). \u2018Are we good? or do we need to keep going?\u2019: unraveling auditors\u2019 comfort with evi<span class=\"outlook-search-highlight\" data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>nce sufficiency <span class=\"outlook-search-highlight\" data-markjs=\"true\">de<\/span>terminations.&nbsp;<i>European Accounting Review<\/i>, 1\u201327. <a title=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09638180.2025.2589183\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09638180.2025.2589183\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09638180.2025.2589183<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Suppose you think of auditors\u2019 work as completing a puzzle. Auditors can\u2019t form a complete picture to conclude that the financial statements are \u201cfree from material misstatement\u201d when evidence is missing or incorrect. &nbsp; Audit evidence, then, is the information the auditors rely on to form a sound judgment. &nbsp; But not all evidence is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1585,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[260],"tags":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v20.12 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>\u2018Are we good? or do we need to keep going?\u2019: unraveling auditors\u2019 comfort with evidence sufficiency determinations - ARC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Are we good? or do we need to keep going?\u2019: unraveling auditors\u2019 comfort with evidence sufficiency determinations - ARC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Suppose you think of auditors\u2019 work as completing a puzzle. Auditors can\u2019t form a complete picture to conclude that the financial statements are \u201cfree from material misstatement\u201d when evidence is missing or incorrect. &nbsp; Audit evidence, then, is the information the auditors rely on to form a sound judgment. &nbsp; But not all evidence is [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/blog\/2025\/12\/31\/are-we-good-or-do-we-need-to-keep-going-unraveling-auditors-comfort-with-evidence-sufficiency-determinations\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"ARC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-12-31T19:19:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-02-16T08:24:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"ELICA KRASTEVA\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"ELICA KRASTEVA\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/blog\/2025\/12\/31\/are-we-good-or-do-we-need-to-keep-going-unraveling-auditors-comfort-with-evidence-sufficiency-determinations\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/blog\/2025\/12\/31\/are-we-good-or-do-we-need-to-keep-going-unraveling-auditors-comfort-with-evidence-sufficiency-determinations\/\",\"name\":\"\u2018Are we good? or do we need to keep going?\u2019: unraveling auditors\u2019 comfort with evidence sufficiency determinations - ARC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-31T19:19:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-16T08:24:19+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/#\/schema\/person\/4d419d69aac5b96e0f5cf971e24caf57\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/blog\/2025\/12\/31\/are-we-good-or-do-we-need-to-keep-going-unraveling-auditors-comfort-with-evidence-sufficiency-determinations\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/\",\"name\":\"ARC\",\"description\":\"Advanced Resources Center\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/#\/schema\/person\/4d419d69aac5b96e0f5cf971e24caf57\",\"name\":\"ELICA KRASTEVA\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/blog\/members\/1585\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u2018Are we good? or do we need to keep going?\u2019: unraveling auditors\u2019 comfort with evidence sufficiency determinations - ARC","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Are we good? or do we need to keep going?\u2019: unraveling auditors\u2019 comfort with evidence sufficiency determinations - ARC","og_description":"Suppose you think of auditors\u2019 work as completing a puzzle. Auditors can\u2019t form a complete picture to conclude that the financial statements are \u201cfree from material misstatement\u201d when evidence is missing or incorrect. &nbsp; Audit evidence, then, is the information the auditors rely on to form a sound judgment. &nbsp; But not all evidence is [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/blog\/2025\/12\/31\/are-we-good-or-do-we-need-to-keep-going-unraveling-auditors-comfort-with-evidence-sufficiency-determinations\/","og_site_name":"ARC","article_published_time":"2025-12-31T19:19:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-02-16T08:24:19+00:00","author":"ELICA KRASTEVA","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"ELICA KRASTEVA","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/blog\/2025\/12\/31\/are-we-good-or-do-we-need-to-keep-going-unraveling-auditors-comfort-with-evidence-sufficiency-determinations\/","url":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/blog\/2025\/12\/31\/are-we-good-or-do-we-need-to-keep-going-unraveling-auditors-comfort-with-evidence-sufficiency-determinations\/","name":"\u2018Are we good? or do we need to keep going?\u2019: unraveling auditors\u2019 comfort with evidence sufficiency determinations - ARC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-12-31T19:19:22+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-16T08:24:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/#\/schema\/person\/4d419d69aac5b96e0f5cf971e24caf57"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/blog\/2025\/12\/31\/are-we-good-or-do-we-need-to-keep-going-unraveling-auditors-comfort-with-evidence-sufficiency-determinations\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/#website","url":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/","name":"ARC","description":"Advanced Resources Center","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/#\/schema\/person\/4d419d69aac5b96e0f5cf971e24caf57","name":"ELICA KRASTEVA","url":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/blog\/members\/1585\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6579"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1585"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6579"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6579\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6582,"href":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6579\/revisions\/6582"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6579"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6579"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/arc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6579"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}