{"id":220,"date":"2018-07-28T11:00:31","date_gmt":"2018-07-28T11:00:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/submission-review-process\/"},"modified":"2022-10-13T11:39:23","modified_gmt":"2022-10-13T11:39:23","slug":"submission-review-process","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/submission-review-process\/","title":{"rendered":"Submission\/Review Process"},"content":{"rendered":"<table border=\"0\" cellpadding=\"1\" cellspacing=\"20\" width=\"100%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td align=\"left\" valign=\"top\" width=\"50%\">\n<p><span style=\"font-size: x-large\"><span><span><span><strong>Submission &amp; Review Process<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">     <strong style=\"font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: 18px;text-align: center\"><span>The notifications of acceptance were sent to the submitters&nbsp;<\/span><br \/>     <span>on 7<\/span><sup><span>th<\/span><\/sup><span>&nbsp;February 2019.<\/p>\n<p>     <span style=\"font-size: 14px\">(if you have&nbsp;questions, please contact Nicole &#8211;&nbsp;<a href=\"mailto:coopman@eiasm.be\">coopman@eiasm.be<\/a>)<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>     <span style=\"font-size:14px\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif\"><strong><span>Improving the review process<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span><span style=\"font-size: 12px\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,geneva,sans-serif\">With the aim to improve the academic profile of the EAA annual congresses, the SSC has been implementing new changes during the last few years. These range from the requirement of full papers only to the introduction of discussants for papers of particular interest. The review process has also been improved. Not only has the SC gradually been increased up to 250 members, including the SSC members, but the scoring methodology has also been refined and included on this website (see below). Moreover, the submission categories have been gradually revised to obtain a clearer picture of the topics and research methods. In our view this will not only improve the review process but also the organisation of the sessions.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>     <span style=\"font-size:14px\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif\"><strong><span>Submission categories<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span><span style=\"font-size: 12px\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,geneva,sans-serif\">In order to increase the dialogue amongst various research perspectives, and to avoid the creation of dogmatic paradigms, the SSC employs a submission procedure that tries to capture both the topic and method of a submitted paper. In this way, sessions could be organised according to topics but each author\/paper will carry a &lsquo;key&rsquo; identifying the research method\/perspective that the author thinks better describes the paper. This will facilitate the work of the SSC in preparing sessions and will make it possible to combine in a session papers in different ways (e.g. keeping homogeneity of methods or mixing them as they deal with the same topic). The result will hopefully be interesting as comparison of approaches is now possible.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span><span style=\"font-size: 12px\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,geneva,sans-serif\">Consequently authors are invited to submit papers to any of the categories indicated below:<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span><strong><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\">A) Subject\/Topic<\/span><\/span><\/strong><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\"> of the paper submitted:<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span><strong><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\">AU = Auditing&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><\/strong><br \/>     <span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\">Submissions in the area of auditing and assurance.<\/p>\n<p>     <strong>ED = Accounting Education&nbsp;<\/strong><br \/>     Submissions dealing with any educational aspects of accounting, for example related to professional accountants, students, and pupils, but also institutions of education.<\/p>\n<p>     <strong>FA = Financial Analysis<\/strong><br \/>     Submissions in the area of financial accounting which focus on the users; it uses a set of methods to extract information from financial statements and other sources information and relate it to value of equity and debt investment and to interests of other stakeholders.<\/p>\n<p>     <strong>FR = Financial Reporting&nbsp;<\/strong><br \/>     Submission in the area of financial accounting which focus on the preparers; it analyses the choices and methods concerning the preparation of financial statements, taking into account firm characteristics, accounting standards, as well as institutions.<\/p>\n<p>     <strong>GV = Accounting and Governance&nbsp;<\/strong><br \/>     Submissions which relate to the interface between corporate governance and accounting.<\/p>\n<p>     <strong>HI = History<\/strong><br \/>     Submissions which adopt an historical perspective, and investigate historical issues of accounting thought and practices.<\/p>\n<p>     <strong>IC = Interdisciplinary\/Critical<\/strong><br \/>     Submissions that draw on more than one discipline, ideally exploring their interrelations, or that draw on any of the various strands of critical theory.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span><strong><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\">IS = Accounting and Information Systems&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><\/strong><br \/>     <span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\">Submissions in the area of the interface between accounting, information technology and systems.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>     <strong><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\">MA = Management Accounting<\/span><\/span><\/strong><br \/>     <span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\">Submissions in the area of management accounting and control systems.<\/p>\n<p>     <strong>PSNP = Public Sector Accounting &amp; Not-For-Profit Accounting<\/strong><br \/>     Submissions on accounting in the public and voluntary sectors.<\/p>\n<p>     <strong>SEE = Social and Environmental Accounting&nbsp;&amp; Ethical Issues in Accounting<\/strong><br \/>     Submissions dealing with all aspects of social and environmental accounting.<\/p>\n<p>     <strong>TX = Taxation&nbsp;<\/strong><br \/>     Submissions on the subject of taxation.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>     <span><strong><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\">B) Methodology\/Perspective<\/span><\/span><\/strong><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\"> that betters describes the paper submitted:<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span><strong><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\">AM = Analytical\/Modelling<\/span><\/span><\/strong><br \/>     <span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\">Submissions which derive their conclusions by an explicit analysis of mathematical models or other concrete specifications of economic relationships (e.g., graphics).<\/p>\n<p>     <strong>CDIH = Conceptual Development\/Interpretative\/Historical<\/strong><br \/>     Submissions which discuss the purposes of and\/or definitions of and\/or relationships among concepts and\/or apply methodology related to historical perspectives.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span><strong><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\">CF = Case\/Field Study<\/span><\/span><\/strong><br \/>     <span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\">Submissions which utilise the case study method or conduct field study research through various methodologies (e.g. ethnographies).<\/p>\n<p>     <strong>EA = Empirical Archival&nbsp;<\/strong><br \/>     Submissions which involve the testing of a statistical hypothesis to answer the research question (s); a data base is normally used.<\/p>\n<p>     <strong>EX = Experimental<\/strong><br \/>     Submissions which utilise an experimental design to address the research question(s).<\/p>\n<p>     <strong>SU = Survey<\/strong><br \/>     Submissions which utilise a survey methodology to address the research <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>     <span style=\"font-size:14px\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif\"><strong><span>Types of sessions<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\">Regarding the 2019 conference, there will be three types of sessions:<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\"><span><strong><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\">Parallel Session with Discussant <\/span><\/span><\/strong><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\">(PSD), where selected relevant papers will be individually discussed by experts in the area (2 papers in each session);<\/span><\/span><\/span><br \/>      &nbsp;<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\"><span><strong><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\">Parallel Session <\/span><\/span><\/strong><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\">(PS), that will include 3 papers in a normal session; and,<\/span><\/span><\/span><br \/>      &nbsp;<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\"><span><strong><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\">Research Forum Session <\/span><\/span><\/strong><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\">(RF), where 5 less-developed papers will be briefly presented in each session.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\">The decision to be included in each of these sessions will be made by the SSC taking into account the scores obtained in the review process.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span><strong><u><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\">If your paper is accepted for a PSD session, you are expected to be a discussant for another paper.<\/span><\/span><\/u><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>     <span style=\"font-size:14px\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif\"><strong><span>Review instructions<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\"><span>To &#039;anchor&#039; the grading of the papers to be presented at the congress, the following assumption will be made: be ready for submission to a journal like <em>European Accounting Review<\/em> (EAR) or <em>Accounting in Europe<\/em> (AinE). If so they will score a 4 in the scoring system outlined below. As the 4 is the reference level we now give more information on what 4 would represent for papers submitted, but first keep in mind the definition of full papers provided above.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\"><span>To achieve a <strong>4<\/strong>, a full paper defined submitted should:<\/p>\n<p>     a) present a coherent argument,<br \/>     b) address a topic of research interest and importance,<br \/>     c) display awareness of previous work in the area,<br \/>     d) outline a valid research approach,<br \/>     e) include evidence and\/or arguments which, although possibly incomplete, appear reliable, and<br \/>     f ) indicate awareness of the work which may still be required.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\"><span>Based on the &#039;anchor&#039;, the scoring system is:<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\"><span>6 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: arial,sans-serif\"><span>&rarr;<\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\"><span> The paper has very good chances in the review process of a good accounting journal (e.g. EAR or AinE).<br \/>     5 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: arial,sans-serif\"><span>&rarr;<\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\"><span> The paper has good chances in the review process of a good accounting journal (e.g. EAR or AinE).<br \/>     4 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: arial,sans-serif\"><span>&rarr;<\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\"><span> The paper could reasonably be submitted to a journal like EAR or AinE.<br \/>     3 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: arial,sans-serif\"><span>&rarr;<\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\"><span> Not yet ready for submission.<br \/>     2 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: arial,sans-serif\"><span>&rarr;<\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\"><span> Represents initial work on a potentially viable project, but is not likely to be&nbsp;ready&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\"><span>for submission<br \/>     &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;for some time.<br \/>     1 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: arial,sans-serif\"><span>&rarr;<\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\"><span> The submitted work does not, as yet, provide evidence of a viable research project.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\"><span>The reviewers&rsquo; comments, when available, will be&nbsp;systematically&nbsp;released to the authors. However, comments from the reviewers will not be compulsory and authors should not expect the same type of comments made when submitting to a journal.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\"><span>Should you&nbsp;have <strong>questions<\/strong>, please contact <strong><em>Nicole Coopman<\/em><\/strong>, the EAA 2019 Paper Review Coordinator, via e-mail (<\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 11pt\"><span style=\"font-family: calibri,sans-serif\"><a><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\"><span style=\"color: blue\">submissions@eaacongress.org<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 9pt\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,sans-serif\"><span>).<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>     &nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Submission &amp; Review Process The notifications of acceptance were sent to the submitters&nbsp; on 7th&nbsp;February 2019. (if you have&nbsp;questions, please contact Nicole &#8211;&nbsp;coopman@eiasm.be) Improving the review process With the aim to improve the academic profile of the EAA annual congresses, the SSC has been implementing new changes during the last few years. These range from [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2943,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v20.12 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Submission\/Review Process - Congress 2019<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Submission\/Review Process - Congress 2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Submission &amp; Review Process The notifications of acceptance were sent to the submitters&nbsp; on 7th&nbsp;February 2019. (if you have&nbsp;questions, please contact Nicole &#8211;&nbsp;coopman@eiasm.be) Improving the review process With the aim to improve the academic profile of the EAA annual congresses, the SSC has been implementing new changes during the last few years. These range from [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/submission-review-process\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Congress 2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-10-13T11:39:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/submission-review-process\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/submission-review-process\/\",\"name\":\"Submission\/Review Process - Congress 2019\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-28T11:00:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-10-13T11:39:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/submission-review-process\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/submission-review-process\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/submission-review-process\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Submission\/Review Process\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/\",\"name\":\"Congress 2019\",\"description\":\"Just another EAA Sites site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Submission\/Review Process - Congress 2019","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Submission\/Review Process - Congress 2019","og_description":"Submission &amp; Review Process The notifications of acceptance were sent to the submitters&nbsp; on 7th&nbsp;February 2019. (if you have&nbsp;questions, please contact Nicole &#8211;&nbsp;coopman@eiasm.be) Improving the review process With the aim to improve the academic profile of the EAA annual congresses, the SSC has been implementing new changes during the last few years. These range from [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/submission-review-process\/","og_site_name":"Congress 2019","article_modified_time":"2022-10-13T11:39:23+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/submission-review-process\/","url":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/submission-review-process\/","name":"Submission\/Review Process - Congress 2019","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-07-28T11:00:31+00:00","dateModified":"2022-10-13T11:39:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/submission-review-process\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/submission-review-process\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/submission-review-process\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Submission\/Review Process"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/#website","url":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/","name":"Congress 2019","description":"Just another EAA Sites site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/220"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2943"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=220"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/220\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":221,"href":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/220\/revisions\/221"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/eaa-online.org\/congress-2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=220"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}